Re: NEC-LIST: World Radio Noise Maps

From: J. C. Mc Laughlin <jcm_at_email.domain.hidden>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:25:39 -0500

Dear Moderator:
    I have addressed these issues with you in the past. There is not the
slightest deception or covering of identity going on in my messages nor by
my ISP.
    As I recall, a careful reading of the quoted RFC suggests that the dot
use mentioned is not mandatory.

    Please modify the filter used not to be upset with my messages.

    Regards,
    Professor James C. Mc Laughlin

J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A.
Home: JCM_at_Power-Net.Net

<gweep-lists-nec-list-moderator_at_robomod.net> writes:
> The robomoderation software issued the following warning(s) about your
> posting. Your post has been accepted so far despite these warnings,
> but you should probably address the specific problems that triggered
> them before posting again.
>
> The Message-ID header in your email was badly formed, according to
> RFC 2822. The rhs of your Message-ID header did not have a dot
> in it, or was localhost.localdomain, and as such cannot be a
> globally unique hostname. For more details see the robomod FAQ:
> http://www.robomod.net/doc/faq.txt
> Your Message-ID will be replaced with a valid one.
>
> This group has no specific posting guidelines. Please read the mailing
> list etiquette FAQ at
> http://www.gweep.ca/~edmonds/usenet/ml-etiquette.html
>
> A copy of your message is attached below.
>
> ----- snip -----
> Return-Path: <jcm_at_power-net.net>
> X-Original-To: nec-list_at_robomod.net
> Received: from sol01.isp.gweep.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by sol01.isp.gweep.ca (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B411ADA7
> for <nec-list_at_robomod.net>; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:05:49 -0500 (CDT)
> Received: from mailsrvr01.power-net.net (mail03.power-net.net
[216.111.202.29])
> by sol01.isp.gweep.ca (SMTP proxy) with SMTP id 4661
> for <nec-list_at_robomod.net>; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:05:50 -0500
> Received: from upstairstt ([216.111.206.20])
> by mailsrvr01.power-net.net (Power-Net Mail v1.0) with SMTP id
JGC74782;
> Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:05:22 -0400
> X-Bad-Message-ID: <001801c57018$b8d0e0f0$0200a8c0_at_upstairstt>
> From: "J. C. Mc Laughlin" <jcm_at_power-net.net>
> References: <T2qoID.A.xv.htXrCB_at_sol01.isp.gweep.ca>
> Subject: Re: NEC-LIST: World Radio Noise Maps
> X-Original-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:06:32 -0400
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
> X-Gweep-Cleanmime: -outlookquoting quoted=60% miswrapped=18%
> Message-ID: <mVVUCD.A.LJB.vSYrCB_at_sol01.isp.gweep.ca>
> X-Gweep-Robomod-Bayes-Score: 0.0001
> Newsgroups: gweep.lists.nec-list
> Approved-Poster: yes known
> Organization: gweep.lists.nec-list moderation hosted by Gweep Systems
>
> Dear Doug:
> I am under the impression that revised versions of the noise maps (in
> digital form) are used in the latest version of IONCAP, the most
accessible
> version of which is VOACAP. (Available from:
> http://elbert.its.bldrdoc.gov/hf.html
>
>
> It has been decades since such critical information has been used in a
> graphical format. You do, however, pose a most interesting question.
>
> I shall try to fit in a bit of a look into my library.
>
> Warm regards, Mac
>
> J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A.
> Home: JCM_at_Power-Net.Net
> University: JCM_at_Kettering.Edu
>
> "D. B. Miron" <dbmiron_at_paulbunyan.net> writes:
> > Good day,
> >
> > I have a copy of CCIR Report 65 "Revision of Atmospheric
> > Radio Noise Data", ITU, Geneva, 1957 which has maps of
> > average noise contours for six time blocks and four season,
> > and curves of average noise vs. frequency to go with them.
> > A search of the web and a reading and search of the ITU web
> > site indicates that the most recent such data is CCIR Report
> > 322, from 1963, but this doesn't seem to be available
> > anywhere. I did find an ITU Opinion that there are errors
> > in 322 which ought to be fixed. Whatever their utility, I
> > think a sample of these maps and curves has instructional
> > value.
> > 1. Is the data in 322 significantly different than the data
> > in 65?
> > 2. Is there an electronic version of these maps anywhere?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Doug Miron
> >

-- 
The NEC-List mailing list
NEC-List_at_robomod.net
http://www.robomod.net/mailman/listinfo/nec-list
Received on Mon Jun 13 2005 - 13:26:06 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:45 EDT