Good day Jerry,
Your last message, about changing the current
representation, misdirected me (unintenionally, I'm sure) to
look at the subroutine CABC. Not being generally familiar
with the code, I could only see that some A, B, C,-related
vectors are being recalculated. It struck me while
re-reading the section above eq. (67) that, of course the
total current on a segment can have the same three term
representation because all the component main and tail
functions that have the segment as a domain have this form.
Therefore, the coefficients for the three-term total current
are just the sums of the corresponding coefficients of all
the basis function components for that segment.
I have another problem with the theory presentation. The
current-continuity equations (41) and (42) are said to lead
to a solution for the Q_i^(+/-) values. If I differentiate
these equations and substitute the a_(i or j) Q_i values
given for the derivatives earlier, the Q_i values factor
out. Also, if the wires all have the same radius, I get
N^(+/-)=1. I am assuming that the definition for the
a_j^(+/-) items is the same as for the a_i terms. What am I
missing?
Regards,
Doug Miron
-- The NEC-List mailing list NEC-List_at_robomod.net http://www.robomod.net/mailman/listinfo/nec-listReceived on Sat Aug 14 2004 - 14:43:33 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:44 EDT