Good day Chris.
I seem to recall that Marconi or some other company in the UK had a similar
antenna on offer. It was intended for use at near vertical incidence
skywave. This would obviously restrict the frequency to less than roughly
12 MHz. In this case it should not be necessary to raise the antenna more
than about 5 metres above the ground.
Best regards,
Duncan Baker.
"chris Turner" <turner.c_at_virgin.net> writes:
> (long lines)
>
> The following appeared on a technical news group and I too would like an
answer to this problem.
> Can anyone help?
>
> Yesterday I erected a horizontal quad loop for 160 between 4 wooden poles
10m up.
> It works OK on 160 and 80 TX and RX on all HF bands. No problem with a ATU
on the higher bands.
> I used this very same antenna many years ago in ZS3 (now V51) with great
success, BUT, it
> worked on ALL HF bands with low SWR (we then called it a German Quad).
> I cannot recall what I did differently then and lost the original 73
Magazine article with all the specs, etc.
> Current setup: feeding it with 50ohm coax to a 1:1 balun (yes I know the
match is not
> perfect but this is the very same balun I used way back).
> I vaguely remember something of a step ladder at the opposite end of the
cubica. Ideally I would
> like to use a 2:1 or 3:1 balun. I don't want to use an ATU.
>
> Any help, ideas and advice?
>
> Chris Turner IEng MIIE
> G4HKP
> Tel: +44 1844 238502
> Mob: +44 7812 174133
>
> --
> The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
> http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list
>
-- The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca> http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-listReceived on Mon Jul 12 2004 - 11:49:33 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:44 EDT