Re: NEC-LIST: thin-wire general EM equations

From: Peter Excell <p.excell_at_email.domain.hidden>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:10:23 -0400

I think T.T. Wu used a refinement of Hallen's equation. I believe that Schelkunoff's method was more approximate - OK for the pre-computer era.
 
Peter Excell

________________________________

From: nec-list-bounces+p.excell=newi.ac.uk_at_robomod.net on behalf of GrantBingeman_at_cs.com
Sent: Fri 12/06/2009 23:58
To: nec-list_at_robomod.net
Subject: Re: NEC-LIST: thin-wire general EM equations

Schelkunoff's biconical antenna approach is reasonable, but i suspect it
breaks down for electrically long dipoles of length greater than, say 3
lambda. Comments anyone? What about Hallen's approach? g

Grant W. Bingeman, P.E.

--
The NEC-List mailing list
NEC-List_at_robomod.net
http://www.robomod.net/mailman/listinfo/nec-list
-- 
The NEC-List mailing list
NEC-List_at_robomod.net
http://www.robomod.net/mailman/listinfo/nec-list
Received on Fri Jun 12 2009 - 23:09:35 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:46 EDT