John-
Probably most you comments stand regarding the validity of the
calculated results, however note that Mirko was referring to 4nec2 which
utilizes the NEC2 engine, not NEC4.
Regards,
-Raymond Anderson
Senior Signal Integrity Staff Engineer
Xilinx Inc.
>
>Mirko,
>
>I am not sure what you mean by "taking something out file to
>calculate a magnitude that agrees with theory"???
>
>As far as I am concerned NEC-4D calculates near fields that agree
>with measurement. In a paper I presented at the AP-S Symposium, June
>2004, Monterey, CA, I reported on validation of NEC based on
>extensive accurate MF antenna experiments, including near fields ---
>we measured E and H fields beneath the elevated radials of a monopole
>antenna --- radial height 3m, measurement height 1.5m. The NEC
>values are NOT multiplied by an "incomprehensible factor"!!!
>
>
>J.S. Belrose and S. White, "On Validation of NEC-MoM: A useful tool
>for MF Antenna Design", AP-S Symposium, Secial Session
> on 30 Years of NEC, Monterey, CA, June 2004.
>
>John S. Belrose
>
>
-- The NEC-List mailing list NEC-List_at_robomod.net http://www.robomod.net/mailman/listinfo/nec-listReceived on Sat Nov 27 2004 - 03:01:18 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:44 EDT