Re: NEC-LIST: What am I doing wrong and/or don't understand ?

From: <4nec2_at_email.domain.hidden>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:53:06 -0800 (PST)

Hello Doug,

> I see you don't have conductor loss in your inputs. Try
> that and see what happens. Also, what's the input impedance
> look like? The gain you get from NEC is relative to the
> input power. If the two antennas have the same pattern, and
> no loss is modeled, their efficiencies will be 100 % and
> their gains will be the same.

Yes, and that's why I did not include any losses. But when
looking at the far-field pattern for both models it looks to me
that the two-wire model has (far) better performance than the
1-wire model.

For as far as I know, two models without any losses the area
(or should I say the volume) occupied by both the far-field
patterns should be the same. Even if one antenne is a single
element antenne 0.001 wl and the other is a full-size 1/2 wl dipole.

But when looking at both my models this does seem to be
true. (or maybe I am getting a bit blind...)

Arie.

-- 
(Please ignore the advertisements below)
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
Bis 31.1.: TopMail + Digicam für nur 29 EUR http://www.gmx.net/topmail
-- 
The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list
Received on Tue Jan 20 2004 - 19:53:21 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:44 EDT