Re: NEC-LIST: Antenna patents

From: Bibby <m.bibby_at_email.domain.hidden>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 22:09:05 -0800 (PST)

Eric said that "a patent had been granted for an idea that was later
shown to lack novelty ( in fact, there existed well-known prior art.) But
trying to get that patent overturned (there is a formal procedure for
this within the system) was a daunting legal proposition, weighted
heavily in favor of the original patentee. "

Whatever the original intentions of the patent system, this is the
reality today. One CEO described patents to me as "chips at the table"
- a way of bargaining with patent-wielding competition.

Overturning a patent is expensive and arduous.

Defending a patent is also arduous and expensive.

Malcolm M Bibby

-- 
The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list
Received on Thu Jan 01 2004 - 06:09:17 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:44 EDT