Good evening All,
I said to my wife before I went down to check the e-mail this eveing,"I threw
a mudball into a hornets' nest." I got the reaction I expected, except you're
a polite bunch of hornets. I learned to use the Smith Chart and the slide
rule in the days before cheap digital power, but I didn't marry them. I still
own a circular slide rule, but haven't seen it for at least 15 years. I used
to own a spiral telescoping slide rule too, but I'm pretty sure it's
disappeared. Yes, I think it's pretty neat the way impedances map into the
reflection-coefficient plane, but I don't think the "intuitive" feel is at all
intuitive, or that it contributes to the design process. I can run an
L-section prgram in MATLAB in a fraction of the time it would take me to do it
on a Smith Chart program. Then I can immediately find power vs frequency
using another MATLAB function. Before MATLAB, I did this kind of thing in
APL. For me, writing the programs in a general-purpose numerical environment
is more satisfying because I know what goes into the calculations. This is
the first-cut design side. A massive analysis program that takes into account
parasitics and nonlinearities is the next place to go, if necessary.
Doug Miron
-- The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca> http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-listReceived on Thu Sep 26 2002 - 03:13:16 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:42 EDT