RE: NEC-LIST:P4 vs. Xenon

Intel's Xeon (not Xenon) processor is based on the Pentium 4 core. The Xeon
shares similar stats with the Pentium 4, such as a 256 KB L2 cache and
availability at speeds of 1.4 GHz and up. Seems the only difference in Xeon
capability is running in dual-processor configurations, which the regular
Pentium 4 is can't do. Found one internet site that has the dual 1.7GHz Xeon
just barely defeating a dual 1.0GHz P3 system on a Linux kernel compile.

Check here.. for some benchmarks, I'm sure there are others.
http://www4.tomshardware.com/mainboard/01q2/010605/760mp-06.html

Finally it is not ONLY a fast processor with lost of memory that makes a
system
fast, but a good motherboard and a good video board as well. I have seen
some
impressive boots (6 seconds!) with a single Intel P4 2.4GHz, 1G mem, with
Quadro 4 900XGL video board.
v/r
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Cummins [mailto:wfc_at_pacific.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:20 AM
To: nec-list_at_gweep.ca
Subject: NEC-LIST:P4 vs. Xenon

Does anyone have any data on the relative speeds the P4 and Xenon
processors doing NEC calculations? Assume they are running comparable
clock, bus rates and either Linux or Win OS's.. I am not sure the Xenon is
worth the extra cost in single processor configurations.

Bill Cummins

-- 
The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list
-- 
The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list