RE: NEC-LIST:NEC 4.1 & g77

>
>Hi John, et al,
>Using two different NEC v2 programs I get the below answers running your
>nec file on a Win NT machine:
>
>97.335 + j7.697 with a gain of 6.14dBi.
>
>Which is the experimentally validated result? And is a +/- 10% good
>enough for modeling. NEC 4 I hear has some flaws in the way it treats
>some objects, NEC 2 has some shortfalls as well. Both should be able
>to predict the impedance of this simple cone at 3MHz.
>
>v/r
>Ken Carrigan

Can't say anything about NEC4, but NEC2 compiled under both g77 and
Sun f77 on a Solaris platform gets the same answer Ken reported above
when I run the cone input file.

-Ray Anderson

-- 
The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list