Re: NEC-LIST: Fortran execution speed

On 2008-07-13, at 14:03 , Jim Lux wrote:

> Quoting Willard Myers <wlmyers_at_mac.com>, on Sun 13 Jul 2008 09:09:49
> AM PDT:
>
>> On 2008-07-13, at 00:27 , John Kot wrote:
>>
>>> I'd be interested in other people's experience with different
>>> Fortran
>>> compilers and IDEs for NEC and similar MoM codes.
>>
>> gfortran on Mac OS X works well for me when building NEC (2 and 4).
>> It
>> didn't handle "modern" fortran constructs in another project, nor did
>> IBM or Absoft (on Mac OS X). NAG fortran and Intel fortran worked
>> fine
>> and were fast and solid, but somewhat expensive. Today I'd go with
>> Intel if price were not a factor.
>>
>> Bill Myers
>>
> You might look at Intel's non-commercial license, if that's your
> general interest. I believe it's almost free.

Thanks, but Intel fortran for Mac OS X (which integrates nicely with
Apple's Xcode development environment) isn't one of the items in the
non-commercial license list.

FWIW, my I'm using NEC 4.1, compiled with MAXSEG = 30000, with the
very nice cocoaNEC interface created by Kok Chen.

   Bill

-- 
The NEC-List mailing list
NEC-List_at_robomod.net
http://www.robomod.net/mailman/listinfo/nec-list