Good day,
I think there's something wrong in your model. See "Small Antenna Design"
pp 60-66, especially figs. 3.10 and 3.12. This is a presentation of the
short dipole over perfect ground, both vertical and horizontal. You can see
that radiation resistance and directivity ripple around the free-space
values. The ripple begins to damp down by an altitude of 1 wavelength.
However, the greater the altitude, the more lobes the vertical plane
radiation pattern will have.
Regards,
Doug Miron
"wilfam" <wilfam_at_technet2000.com.au> writes:
Dear list,
I am interested in aircraft antennas and their performance as a function of
height.
I have used NEC to investigate the performance of these antennas at various
heights above ground and in free space.
I had expected that when the antenna was a certain number of wavelengths
above the ground then the antennas would approach the free space
performance but this does not seem to be the case. I have been
concentrating on horizontal antennas.
I went back to basics and moved a dipole to a great height using the GM
card. The theta plot looked ragged and non-physical.
I also looked at two-ray models and other analytic work but these didn't
seem to cover the range from ground to free space.
I'd appreciate you help, guidance and any references.
Regards,
Michael.
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.1/690 - Release Date: 16/02/2007 2:25 PM -- The NEC-List mailing list NEC-List_at_robomod.net http://www.robomod.net/mailman/listinfo/nec-list -- The NEC-List mailing list NEC-List_at_robomod.net http://www.robomod.net/mailman/listinfo/nec-listReceived on Mon Feb 26 2007 - 21:45:04 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:46 EDT