Chip
Problem 1 - how would you define the relationship?
Problem 2 - Until recently communication range has been limited by the power
supply requirements of the tag chip and permitted reader TX power. With
battery assisted backscatter tags, (or newer lower voltage tags) communication
range is limited by the noise at the reader receiver and the tag antenna's
differential reflectivity. I am trying to quantify and model the mechanism in
order to better design tag input circuits.
73
Chris
G4HKP
Chris Turner IEng MIIE
Mobile tel: +44 7812 174133
----- Original Message -----
From: Fractenna_at_aol.com
To: turner.c_at_virgin.net
Cc: nec-list_at_gweep.ca
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: NEC-LIST: Backscatter from RFID tags - modeling problem
You are confusing the effective aperture with the true aperture; that's
problem number one.
Analytical estimates of received power are poor predictors of true
performance in RFID tags, due to the multipath environment and random
orientation of tags on SKU's, and so on. That's problem 2.
Finally, is this an academic problem? Tag solutions are now a slam dunk with
modern technology. Its the straps that are the problem--depending on the
vendor source.
73,
Chip N1IR
--
The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list
-- The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca> http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-listReceived on Tue Mar 04 2003 - 08:45:13 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:44 EDT