Doug,
I think your algebra might need checking:
Q = 2*pi*(stored energy)/(energy lost per cycle)
which can be restated as:
Q = 2*pi*(stored energy)/(energy lost per 2*pi radians)
or
Q = (stored energy)/(energy lost per radian)
is this right? it seems to work for a series RLC circuit
where the power lost per radian is RI^2/(2.pi.f) and the
peak stored energy is LI^2 (I being the rms current),
hence Q = 2.pi.f.L/R = X/R, a well known result.
All the best
Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: D. B. Miron [mailto:dbmiron_at_paulbunyan.net]
Sent: 05 January 2003 15:08
To: NEC-LIST
Subject: Re: NEC-LIST: Q of multiply-resonant antenna structures.
Good day,
I'd like to remind everybody that the energy-based definition is
Q=2*pi*(stored energy)/(energy lost per cycle)
which can be restated as
Q=(stored energy)/(energy lost per (2*pi radians)),
not (stored energy)/(energy lost per radian).
Even for simple elements or circuits, Q is a function of frequency. I agree
with Lux and Simpson that it is not very useful for complex wideband
circuits or assemblies. If, however, an antenna system has a number of
sharp resonances, Q can be found at each of these, and is meaningful
(useful).
Doug Miron
-- The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca> http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list *************************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. *************************************************************************** -- The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca> http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-listReceived on Mon Jan 06 2003 - 09:46:18 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:43 EDT