I'm afraid I find the difference between free and $3800 significant enough
to endure NEC2/Windows problems.
SuperNEC looks like a nice product, but it's price puts it well out of
reach for a hobbyist.
Regards,
Brent DeWitt
"Brandon Orchard" <brandon.orchard_at_poynting.co.za>@gweep.ca on 04/26/2002
08:47:43 AM
Sent by: nec-list-admin_at_gweep.ca
To: "neclist" <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
cc:
Subject: FW: NEC-LIST:Help with NEC2D and all its variants running on
Windows XP
SuperNEC also does not have any memmory limitation problems
----- Original Message -----
From: <brent.dewitt_at_us.datex-ohmeda.com>
To: "Ralph B. Holland" <ralph_at_arising.com.au>
Cc: <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: FW: NEC-LIST:Help with NEC2D and all its variants running on
Windows XP
> Do the new executables under XP eliminate the 256 MB memory limitation
> found when running under ME?
>
> TIA,
>
> Brent
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Ralph B. Holland" <ralph_at_arising.com.au>@gweep.ca on 04/26/2002 06:16:03
> AM
>
> Sent by: nec-list-admin_at_gweep.ca
>
>
> To: <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
> cc:
>
> Subject: FW: NEC-LIST:Help with NEC2D and all its variants running on
> Windows XP
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been informed that these executables are in fact
> already on the Unofficial archives and are named
> necdX500, nec2dx1500, nec2dx3000, nec2dx500 and the Somnec2d(x)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ralph
> --
> The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
> http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list
> --
> The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
> http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list
-- The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca> http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list -- The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca> http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-listReceived on Fri Apr 26 2002 - 15:35:46 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:42 EDT