> Hi Steve,
> Yes, the issue is getting the best receiver performance given a very poor
> antenna. But, interestingly, when I run what I believe to be a reasonable
> NEC simulation of the antenna (an 8 foot piece of wire fed at the base), I
> get an impedance of .004338 - J68240. This is, indeed, highly capacitive
> (at 23.3 pf, just about what was suggested, but it has a very low resistive
> component, not the 10k to 20k or more that has been suggested.
Very low resistive component in serie, equivalent to a very high
resistive component in parallel, eg 15.7 megohms in your simulation
of a perfect whip.
If you include the losses of a real whip in a real environment you
will get a result closer to the resistive component value that has
been suggested.
Hope this helps.
Gilbert.
-- The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca> http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-listReceived on Sun Jan 20 2002 - 16:07:17 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:42 EDT