> Hello, all. I used the g77 compiler (p/o GCC-2.95) that comes with
> the Red Hat Linux 7.1 distribution CDs to compile NEC 4.1D. The g77
> compiler options were those used by Jergen Von Hagen in compiling NEC
> 2D (re ACES Newsletter Nov '98):
>
> g77 -O3 -fno-emulate-complex -funroll-loops NEC41D.f
>
> While the compile process issued a couple of warnings about same name
> for global and intrinsic and array size, the compile completed
> without error.
quite a few warnings are due to the A(1) and not A(*) notation
used in NEC. There should not be a problem with that.
> I find that when I run a simple halfwave horizontal dipole problem
> over an infinite but imperfect (Sommerfeld) ground, I obtain antenna
when I modified a couple of NEC 4 lines I asked the list for
benchmark problems to test modified sources with these. At
that time there were not benchmark problems posted or communicated
to me, so I only worked with the problems I had. These were
loaded and unloaded, with and without networks wire antennas
in free space or over perfect ground. I have not tested
imperfect grounds.
I do not have access to NEC 4 (you're not allowed to export to
non-US countries), so I can't help you with testing and looking
into these even though I would like to very much.
Can you send me the nec files when they are useable with NEC 2?
> I also tried a straight g77 compile (i.e. g77 NEC4D.f) but with no improvement.
so it seems that there is no problem with the optimization.
thanks
juergen
-- Institut fuer Hoechstfrequenztechnik und Elektronik - Uni Karlsruhe Tel +49 721 608 76 76 - Fax +49 721 69 18 65 -- The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca> http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-listReceived on Fri Nov 30 2001 - 11:06:44 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:41 EDT