If I recall correctly, the Ohio State MOM code was based on the work of Jack
Richmond. I used this code quite extensively in the late 1980's but found
some significant discrepancies between it and NEC. Through measurement
data, I determined that the NEC code provided more accurate results, at
least for the antennas I was modeling at that time. These were bifilar and
quadrifilar helix antennas.
Although I use NEC almost exclusively, I would be interested in knowing if
Ohio State or anyone else kept the Richmond code "up to date".
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: nec-list-admin_at_gweep.ca [mailto:nec-list-admin_at_gweep.ca]On Behalf
Of Chuck Vandament
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 6:32 PM
To: nec-list_at_gweep.ca
Subject: NEC-LIST:Quad/dipole- Ohio State Program?
Bob,
What Ohio State program? I have been out of the loop, I guess. I thought
the
O.S. programs were GTD programs. I am a loyal subject of King Burke,
master of MoM, but I would like to know about the competition. (Its a
joke, Jerry --; friends?)
Smilin' Chuck
-- The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca> http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list -- The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca> http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-listReceived on Mon Oct 15 2001 - 10:15:42 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:41 EDT