Re: NEC-LIST:NEC-LIST Quad loop/folded dipole

From: R.P.Haviland <bobh_at_email.domain.hidden>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 19:19:00 -0400

The standard formulas for dipole length and loop perimeter are reasonably
accurate for normal element diameters, but should not be used outside a
narrow range. There is data on values for other diameters and some other
loop shapes in my book, 'the quad antenna', published by CQ Communications.
The latest data is in the series of articles on 'the quad antenna
revisited', in Communications Quarterly and in QEX. Use one of the NEC
programs or the Ohio State program for best accuracy.
bob w4mb

-- 
The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list

Received on Sat Oct 13 2001 - 21:16:41 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bibby: "Re: NEC-LIST:NEC-LIST Quad loop/folded dipole"
Previous message: Chuck Counselman: "RE: Re: NEC-LIST:Proper Antenna Patterns"
In reply to: ken hanson: "NEC-LIST:NEC-LIST Quad loop/folded dipole"
Next in thread: Bibby: "Re: NEC-LIST:NEC-LIST Quad loop/folded dipole"
Reply: Bibby: "Re: NEC-LIST:NEC-LIST Quad loop/folded dipole"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:41 EDT