Harry E Green wrote:
>
> Dear fellow NEC-lister,
>
> Schelkunoff is an author from whose clear insight much is to be
> learned.
Absolutely.
>
>
> As the impulse passes along the conductor, the charges are first
> accelerated in one direction and then immediately equally and
> oppositely in the other, so there is no NET acceleration. Two mutually
> cancellatory kinks are produced and there is therefore no net
> radiation field. This will be true everywhere except at the ends where
But the derivative of a delta-function is not zero (and it would be
by this argument!) If you give the impulse a finite width, the
two contributions will not cancel since they come from different
locations. And if your source is a sine wave, the succesive pulses
have a width of effectively half a wavelength.
> the impulse comes to a halt and is reversed (reflected). Here there is
> net acceleration and therefore radiation. The travelling impulse
> therefore radiates only from the end of the wire.
Most of its energy (if it has a large bandwidth,) but I expect this
not to hold for the low-frequency content (see above). And it also
need not be true for the usual half-wave (or full wave) dipole with
sine wave excitation. See movies on:
http://www.iae.nl/users/bergervo/gouy/dipole.html
Greetings,
Jos
-- Dr. Jozef R. Bergervoet Electromagnetism and EMC Philips Research Laboratories, Eindhoven, The Netherlands Building WS01 FAX: +31-40-2742224 E-mail: bergervo_at_natlab.research.philips.com Phone: +31-40-2742403Received on Thu Mar 02 2000 - 13:29:26 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:40 EDT