>From the desk of Keith Lysiak <KLysiak_at_swri.edu>
I use NEC regularly to model DF systems in the HF\VHF\UHF
frequency ranges with very good success. I have modeled cellular and
PCS applications up to 1.9GHz with good success. DF applications
typically require both accurate amplitude and phase comparisons.
There are various distinct advantages of one method (GTD vs
MoM) over the other but both have their applications and practical
uses. With adequate computer resources, both should be able to
provide good results when properly applied in this frequency range.
End of Message
---------- Original Text ----------
From: "Dante Conti" <transtel_at_correionet.com.br>, on 9/17/1999 2:57 AM:
To: Incognito2_at_CTC@SwRI26["NEC LIST" <nec-list_at_ee.ubc.ca>]
Greetings,
Does anyone already have tried NEC-BSC / NEC-BSC Workbench (GTD
approach) from Ohio University (OSU) against NecWinPro (MoM approach)
from Nittany-Sci in order to predict antenna pattern distortion caused
by nearby structures/others antennas at the VHF/UHF broadcast
environment and would like to share its experience / thoughts about
the applicability of GTD vs. MoM for the modelling of these type of
problem?
Any help is appreciated and thanks in advance.
Dante JS Conti
Trans-Tel
transtel_at_correionet.com.br
Received on Thu Sep 23 1999 - 01:57:06 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:39 EDT