Re: NEC-LIST: Horn antenna

From: <dchatterjee_at_email.domain.hidden>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1999 20:27:50 -0500 (UTC -05:00)

    Horn antennas are *best* modeled via NEC-BSC codes and not
    the NEC-MOM code. The effect of diffraction by the edges
    becomes important for calculating the backlobe and other
    far-out sidelobes. The GTD (or its sibling UTD) is the best
    for treating such problems.

    You may look up the book by Stutzman and Thiele where the
    details of modeling such antennas using the UTD (Uniform
    Theory of Diffraction) is described.

  - best regards,
 =================================================================
  Deb Chatterjee

  Post-Doctoral Research Engineer

  Radar Systems and Remote Sensing Laboratory (RSL), and
  Information Telecommunication Technology Center (ITTC)
  Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
  The University of Kansas, Room 322, Nichols Hall
  2291 Irving Hill Road, Lawrence, KS 66044-7541

  tel: (785)864-7742
  fax: (785)864-7789
  e-mail: dchatterjee_at_kuhub.cc.ukans.edu

On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Hamid H Javadi wrote:
>
> What is a simple model of a horn antenna in the NEC code to function
> as a source of directive radiation to study scattering from a
> reflective surface.
Received on Tue Jul 06 1999 - 23:37:45 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:39 EDT