Paul Moody wrote:
>and battery supply is fitted to the base of the groundplane. ( to
>remove any possibility of feedline radiation ... there is no feedline
>). Modulation and control is via IR link. The bandwidth of the antenna
>is 3.5 Mhz at 29Mhz centre. ( SWR less than 1.3 : 1 across this range
>). I cannot believe that re-radiation can account for field strength
No, but in that case you would expect a poor Gain (-30 to -40 dB)
whereas the CFA was claimed to be as good, or better, than a tuned
dipole. If you would add "and may CFA still has a gain of +7 dB" to
your description, it would become interesting, since your experimental
techniques seem to be perfectly suited for a good test!
Greetings,
Jos
-- Dr. Jozef R. Bergervoet Electromagnetism and EMC Philips Research Laboratories, Eindhoven, The Netherlands Building WS01 FAX: +31-40-2742224 E-mail: bergervo_at_natlab.research.philips.com Phone: +31-40-2742403Received on Tue May 25 1999 - 19:29:23 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:39 EDT