Re: NEC-LIST: CFA and the Hately advertisement

Dear all,

I seem to recall another "invention" which receives almost as much
attention - it is the perpetual motion machine. If this keeps up, we
will only need to pulse the CFA once, and it will be self sustaining -
as has the correspondence on the matter. I am now up around 70 odd
pieces of comment, feedback, discussion etc. on this topic.

Are there NO definitive studies to lay this thing to rest once and for
all?

I agree with Jack - the higher the tower for the CFA the better.
Interesting that it should still need a tower though. Ah, a thought,
maybe they are mounting the CFA on the top, and feeding the tower at
the bottom? ;-)

Have a great day just the same.

Duncan Baker.

--
***************************************************************
Prof. Duncan C. Baker (Pr. Eng., FIEEE, FSAIEE)
Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Eng.,
University of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria, SOUTH AFRICA.
Editor, IEEE Region 8 News.
R8 Homepage - http://www.ewh.ieee.org/reg/8/  or
   http://www.ieee.org/regional/r8/
PHONE +27 12 420 2775 (OFFICE), +27 12 361 7480  (HOME)
FAX   +27 12 362 5000 (OFFICE),  +27 12 348 5314 (HOME)
E-MAIL: dbaker_at_postino.up.ac.za (PREFERRED ADDRESS)
        IEEE alias address: duncan.baker_at_ieee.org
 Private server address:  apc_at_acenet.co.za
LOCAL STANDARD TIME = UT+2 HOURS
****************************************************************