Farhad Rachidi wrote:
>
> Does anybody have some experience in using NEC to model finite, but
> wide metallic surfaces ? The configuration we are interested to model
> is a dipole above a metallic surface of about 5 m x 5 m, at a few GHz.
> Thanks for your help.
This sounds like a problem for NEC-BSC.
In fact, it's example problem 1 in the NEC-BSC user's guide.
NEC-BSC 3.4 is available for Linux, SGI, Windows, and possibly other
platforms from Ohio State University in return for a US$300
duplication fee.
See http://esl.eng.ohio-state.edu/codes/Infnzbsc34.htm for more
details.
See http://esl.eng.ohio-state.edu/codes/Ordlst8.htm for ordering
instructions.
I've attached a copy of the NEC-BSC input file for the problem you
describe. Note that the NEC-BSC user's manual compares the NEC-BSC
output with measured data in Fig. 7.6 on p. 187.
-- Dave Michelson dmichelson_at_home.com -------------------- CE: PLATE-DIPOLE - EXAMPLE 1A UN: UNITS IN INCHES (!) 3 US: SOURCE UNITS IN WAVELENGTHS 0 FR: FREQUENCY (in GHz) 8.0 PF: PATTERN CUT 0., 0., 90., 0. T, 90. 0., 1., 361 PG: PLATE GEOMETRY 4, 0 0., 3.5, 3.5 0., -3.5, 3.5 0., -3.5, -3.5 0., 3.5, -3.5 SG: SOURCE GEOMETRY 5.12, 0., 0. 0., 0., 90. 0. -2, 0.5, 0. 1., 0. PP: PLOTTABLE OUTPUT T T, 5.33, 2.66 0., 360., 36. -40., 0., 10. XQ: EXECUTE CODE EN: END CODE ------------------------Received on Fri May 07 1999 - 16:03:36 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:39 EDT