You could check some papers we wrote some years ago:
Excell, P.S. & Maddocks, A.J.: 'Assessment of Worst-case Receiving
Antenna Characteristics of Metallic Industrial Structures. Part 1:
Electrically-small Structures', Jnl. IERE, Vol. 56, No. 1, (1986), pp.
27-32.
Excell, P.S. & Howson, D.P.: 'Assessment of Worst-case Receiving Antenna
Characteristics of Metallic Industrial Structures. Part 2:
Electrically-large Structures', Jnl. IERE, Vol. 56, No. 1, (1986), pp.
33-36.
These were a result of work on EM hazards, and we coined the term
'uninteded receiving antenna' (URA), which I think is still used.
Peter Excell
Lfresearch_at_aol.com wrote:
>
> I encounter many varied emissions patterns when I'm testing
> objects. The source in many cases is quite easy to locate from the
> radiation pattern, however, there are many cases where it's not.
>
> Could anyone tell me if anyone has documented non-intentional antenna
> radiation patterns.
>
> Derek Walton
> Owner: L F research EMC Design and Test Facility
-- Professor Peter S. Excell Deputy Director Telecommunications Research Centre University of Bradford Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK Tel. 0044 (0)1274 234009 Fax 0044 (0)1274 391521 Email: p.s.excell_at_bradford.ac.uk Web page: http://www.eeng.brad.ac.uk/eeng/pages/psexcellReceived on Thu Mar 04 1999 - 20:09:34 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:39 EDT