Re: NEC-LIST: Wave speed on wires and TL modeling

A correction,

In my previous comment on this topic, a symbol that was correct in my
outgoing message was changed in the one that came back from NEC-LIST,
specifically:

>
>2) A comparison of the spatial I and Q pulses reveals that I â Qc,
> again indicating that the speed of light is applicable.
>

The I/Q relationships should instead read

        I approximately equals Qc, . . .

Ed Miller

[Moderator's Note: Sorry for not catching that. One has to be careful
to use standard ASCII characters when posting to the list. Anything
with a value > 128 is fragile, and probably unreadable to a good
fraction of the list subscribers anyway.]

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Edmund K. Miller
3225 Calle Celestial
Santa Fe, NM 87501-9631
505-820-7371 (voice and FAX)
emiller_at_popmail.esa.lanl.gov
emiller_at_nm-us.campus.mci.net
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Received on Thu Jun 18 1998 - 18:38:06 EDT