Re: NEC-LIST: MININEC Shows Standing Waves at Resonance on Twinline

From: Chuck Counselman <ccc_at_email.domain.hidden>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 12:25:09 -0400

I wrote:
> BTW, if the resonance-frequency reduction _were_ due to a
> modification of phase velocity along the wire, the necessary
> modification would be an increase, not a decrease.

I think I got that backward. Sorry. But it was just a "by the way."
-C.
Received on Thu Jun 11 1998 - 17:31:10 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Chuck Counselman: "Re: NEC-LIST: MININEC Shows Standing Waves at Resonance on Twinline"
Previous message: Chuck Counselman: "Re: NEC-LIST: MININEC Shows Standing Waves at Resonance on Twinline"
Maybe in reply to: Jerry R. Ehman: "NEC-LIST: MININEC Shows Standing Waves at Resonance on Twinline"
Next in thread: Chuck Counselman: "Re: NEC-LIST: MININEC Shows Standing Waves at Resonance on Twinline"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:38 EDT